• Donate
  • Login
Monday, December 8, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Internet users pinpoint exactly why Trump’s fiery new proposal is so disturbing [TWEETS]

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
29 November 2016
in Global
Reading Time: 3 mins read
162 10
A A
0
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Donald Trump’s latest proposal – announced on Twitter, of course – has got supporters of free speech up in arms. On 29 November, America’s President-elect tweeted:

Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag – if they do, there must be consequences – perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 29, 2016

But while many US citizens treat their national flag with the utmost respect, others consider the principles it supposedly represents to be more important:

if you arrest someone for burning the flag, you may as well burn the constitution. That's just a fact.

— Kevin (@TheKevinDent) November 29, 2016

brooooo you're gonna be president and you're tweeting about revoking 1st amendment rights…

— CaptainSparklez (@CaptainSparklez) November 29, 2016

Trump against the constitution?

The First Amendment of the US Constitution protects citizens’ right to freedom of expression. In both 1989 and 1990, America’s Supreme Court ruled that flag burning was a protected form of free expression. It insisted that the government “may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable”. And in 1967, the court also ruled that the government could not strip people of citizenship without their consent.

One Twitter user pointed out that even former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who Trump has praised, defended people’s right to freedom of expression:

.@realDonaldTrump Dear #KingTrump: Even Scalia disagreed with you. So on this #GivingTuesday, I gave to the @ACLU in your honor. pic.twitter.com/NI89hJ3bof

— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) November 29, 2016

[Note: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a non-profit organisation focused on defending individual rights and liberties.]

But Trump isn’t alone in wanting greater punishments for flag burning. Even his former presidential rival Hillary Clinton co-sponsored a failed bill in 2005 that sought to make the act a crime punishable with jail time or a $100,000 fine.

Flag burning has long been a form of protest in the US. And recently, students at Hampshire College in Massachusetts allegedly burned an American flag in response to Trump’s election victory. Other similar protests have also occurred.

Repression of dissent

One Twitter user pointed out that the proper procedure for destroying damaged US flags is to burn them. In other words, even if Trump did try to push a ban on flag burning through, he’d have to include exceptions.

Other online commentators focused on the more pressing concern of what Trump’s proposal would mean for political freedom in the US. One commented on Trump getting away with his own controversial use of freedom of expression:

.@realDonaldTrump But it's still ok under the 1st amendment to freely engage in racist, divisive hate speech without fear of retribution?

— Wyre Davies (@WyreDavies) November 29, 2016

And Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said:

. @realDonaldTrump First they came for the flag burners, and I did not speak out – for I was not a flag burner.

— Jimmy Wales (@jimmy_wales) November 29, 2016

This was in reference to the famous quote attributed to outspoken Nazi critic Martin Niemöller:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

It’s perfectly possible that Trump knows he wouldn’t be able to pass his proposal into law, and that he’s just trying to distract attention away from coverage of his and his son-in-law’s conflicts of interest. He has certainly manipulated the media like that before. But his Twitter assault on freedom of expression could also be a sign of his desire to repress his political opponents, which would be much more disturbing. And if this is the case, those in America who appreciate their freedom need to stand up now before it’s too late.

Get Involved!

– See more on Donald Trump at The Canary Global.

– Visit our Facebook and Twitter pages for more international coverage.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons

Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Experts have just blown apart Theresa May’s claim she is giving the NHS all the money it needs

Next Post

The companies watching your every move, and the journalist jailed for exposing them [VIDEO]

Next Post

The companies watching your every move, and the journalist jailed for exposing them [VIDEO]

It’s official: the government has been wrecking people’s lives for no reason at all

It's official: the government has been wrecking people's lives for no reason at all

Jeremy Hunt is hoping junior doctors don’t bring up this new revelation at the negotiating table

While Jeremy Hunt obsesses over sexting, a life and death NHS scandal has erupted

Jeremy Corbyn delivers a knockout blow to Theresa May, with just 40 seconds on the clock [VIDEO]

Jeremy Corbyn delivers a knockout blow to Theresa May, with just 40 seconds on the clock [VIDEO]

Parliament just saved Tony Blair’s ass, and paved the way for more reckless wars

Parliament just saved Tony Blair's ass, and paved the way for more reckless wars

Israel
Analysis

Israel executes two unarmed Palestinians after they surrendered

by Charlie Jaay
28 November 2025
Palestine Action
Analysis

Disabled arrestee refuses to be silent, saying “freedom is not to be taken from us without a fight”

by Ed Sykes
28 November 2025
Syria
Analysis

Syria: Fragile peace after Bedouin murders ignite sectarian tensions

by Alex/Rose Cocker
28 November 2025
Barghouti
Skwawkbox

Video: Barghouti honoured with new mural after 24 years as Israel’s political prisoner

by Skwawkbox
28 November 2025
palestine action
Analysis

Shocking new report reveals what really drove the government’s crackdown on Palestine Action

by The Canary
28 November 2025
  • Get our Daily News Email

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact ben@thecanary.co

For other enquiries, contact: hello@thecanary.co

Sign up for the Canary's free newsletter and get disruptive journalism in your inbox twice a day. Join us here.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart