• Donate
  • Login
Sunday, December 7, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

The response to Barbie’s ‘role model’ dolls on International Women’s Day has been perfect

Fréa Lockley by Fréa Lockley
8 March 2018
in Editorial, Global, Trending
Reading Time: 4 mins read
172 2
A A
0
Home Editorial
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

On 8 March, International Women’s Day (IWD) celebrates the achievements of women around the world. It is also a day to acknowledge that “nowhere in the world can women claim to have all the same rights and opportunities as men”, and to work towards positive change.

This year, US toy company Mattel joined the ‘celebration’ and introduced a new line of ‘role model’ Barbie dolls. But as many people have pointed out on social media, they’ve got this badly wrong. These dolls actually epitomise capitalism and negative gender stereotypes.

Empowering?

According to Mattel, the dolls are “empowering female role models”:

With 86% of US moms worried about the type of role models their daughters are exposed to, we are committed to shining a light on empowering female role models in an effort to inspire more girls.

Join us by sharing your role models using #MoreRoleModels. #IWD2018 pic.twitter.com/FnEuBsDh23

— Barbie (@Barbie) March 6, 2018

On one hand, the women chosen for the dolls are genuinely inspiring role models. Mattel included the communist and revolutionary artist Frida Kahlo, Polish journalist and explorer Martyna Wojciechowska, and Katherine Johnson, one of the first Black women to work for NASA.

But there’s a big problem. For a start, the dolls seem to be standard looking Barbie dolls wearing new costumes. And, as many have pointed out, the problems don’t end there.

Women for sale

In 2017, Mattel (the world’s largest toy manufacturer) reported a 15% loss in profits. These ‘role model’ dolls cost nearly $30 in the US. And many have seen this as the company cashing in on IWD for profit:

Is this PR or will these be mass distributed? What is the pricepoint and how many will be made. We aren't helping kids if these all fall into the hands of adult collectors or only those who can afford $100 a doll.

— Supergirl and Brainiac 5 (@kara_querl) March 6, 2018

As Trump’s presidency takes hold, a UN report has found rising levels of “inequality and extreme poverty” in the US. The report found that around 18%, or 13.3 million children, live in poverty: a “shockingly high number”.

But Mattel’s push for profits ignores these children. There’s been no indication, for example, that any profits will be used to help women and children:

But what are you doing with the funds collected from our cultural icons? How are you supporting women and girls’ rights

— ir3n3y (@ir3n3ybee) March 7, 2018

As one commentator observed:

They’re taking our role models, our heroes, and using their likeness to take our money and perpetuate everything we’re trying to dismantle… An incredibly expensive doll who says that -all dreams are possible- seems pretty ironic when most girls can’t even realize their dreams of owning the fucking doll in the first place.

Real women?

Mattel did include UK boxing champion Nicola Adams, and fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad, among the ‘sheroes’. But as Paralympic champion Hannah Cockroft pointed out:

Nice idea @Barbie but would have loved to have seen a disabled role model included! The most under represented minority group in the world need people to look up to too! #MoreRoleModels #Whataboutme? #ShareASmileBecky #InternationalWomensDay https://t.co/Q2TKTdIBEo

— Hannah Cockroft OBE PLY DL (@HanCockroft) March 6, 2018

And others were quick to point out problems with the Kahlo doll:

Mattel has a new line of Barbies, called Role Models. One of them is supposed to be Frida Kahlo, no wheelchair, no accident, operation or polio scars, and no unibrow.#MoreRoleModels @Mattel #DisTheOscars #RepresentationNotErasure

— (((Emmanations))) (@emma_rosenthal) March 6, 2018

Kahlo was famous for celebrating the female form. In self-portraits, she exaggerated her unibrow and refused to conform to idealised standards of beauty:

It’s great that a Frida Kahlo Barbie exists, but it would’ve been greater had the physical feature that subverted (and still subverts) gendered western beauty standards not been minimized: https://t.co/aqzMlsoLHq

— Sam H. Escobar (@myhairisblue) March 7, 2018

In fact, if Kahlo were still alive, there’s a chance she’d prefer this look:

Hey, you should do another design 😉 pic.twitter.com/DVE06i20FD

— Raúl Zepeda Gil 🏳️‍🌈🌹🇲🇽 (@rgzepeda) March 7, 2018

It’s perhaps more likely, though, that she’d not want to be turned into a Barbie at all:

This is such massive disrespect to Frida Kahlo. Disgusting. She was communist. She struggled with her self image. So you make a prettified mass produced doll out of her to sell to young girls. This is against everything she stood for.

— A happy little field mouse (@AngelBurnsBrite) March 8, 2018

Kahlo’s family, meanwhile, has insisted that Mattel did “not have the proper authorization” to use her image:

Comunicado oficial de la Familia Kahlo referente al lanzamiento de la @barbie en honor a #FridaKahlo de @Mattel / Official statement from the Kahlo Family regarding the launch of Mattel's Frida Kahlo "Sheroe" Barbie: pic.twitter.com/7ProPd7c30

— Frida Kahlo (@FridaKahlo) March 8, 2018

Our bodies

It gets worse. Although Mattel is claiming to ‘shine a light’ on incredible women, there’s actually nothing new about these dolls, beyond costumes. Mattel has done little to make the dolls look like the real women they represent:

https://twitter.com/alison_rixon/status/971568095092400129

https://twitter.com/KeithSaiph/status/971562906042200064

#PressforProgress

In reality, these dolls seem to be little more than a cynical marketing ploy; the antithesis of the serious issues IWD seeks to address. As the campaign highlights:

The majority of the world’s 1.3 billion absolute poor are women. On average, women receive between 30 and 40 percent less pay than men earn for the same work. Women also continue to be victims of violence, with rape and domestic violence listed as significant causes of disability and death among women worldwide.

Given these facts, Mattel’s ‘role model’ Barbies are a pretty twisted interpretation of reality, and an insult to women around the world. This year, the theme of IWD is ‘Press for Progress’. But these dolls are a huge step backwards.

Get Involved!

– Support groups that help women in the UK and around the world: Sisters Uncut, Women’s Aid, Women on Wings, The Fawcett Society, Body Gossip.

– Boycott Barbie, and buy dolls from independent UK sellers. Treehouse Dolls is donating 10% of its profits on IWD, and Lottie Dolls “look like kids”.

Featured image via screengrab

Tags: feminism
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Even Guardian writers think the paper’s latest decision is one step too far

Next Post

Labour’s Clive Lewis takes down the Tory minister who started a petition against local cuts

Next Post
Clive Lewis and Gavin Williamson

Labour's Clive Lewis takes down the Tory minister who started a petition against local cuts

Berry and Tornado fighter jet

A government minister goes on a bizarre rant after an arms company pulls out of 'England's biggest event'

BBC Radio Ulster logo

A BBC interviewer is accused of turning ‘interrogator’ live on air

Hands with blood on them

Red carpet for Saudi prince was white before the Tories rolled it out

Mindfulness

Is 'mindfulness' nonsense or does it actually work? I tried it out for myself.

Israel
Analysis

Israel executes two unarmed Palestinians after they surrendered

by Charlie Jaay
28 November 2025
Palestine Action
Analysis

Disabled arrestee refuses to be silent, saying “freedom is not to be taken from us without a fight”

by Ed Sykes
28 November 2025
Syria
Analysis

Syria: Fragile peace after Bedouin murders ignite sectarian tensions

by Alex/Rose Cocker
28 November 2025
Barghouti
Skwawkbox

Video: Barghouti honoured with new mural after 24 years as Israel’s political prisoner

by Skwawkbox
28 November 2025
palestine action
Analysis

Shocking new report reveals what really drove the government’s crackdown on Palestine Action

by The Canary
28 November 2025
  • Get our Daily News Email

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact ben@thecanary.co

For other enquiries, contact: hello@thecanary.co

Sign up for the Canary's free newsletter and get disruptive journalism in your inbox twice a day. Join us here.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart