• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, December 9, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Media hack embodies the uselessness of establishment media coverage of Corbyn and Johnson

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
12 May 2020
in Trending, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
164 8
A A
3
Home Trending
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

One comment from a media hack has just epitomised the uselessness of establishment coverage of Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn. Because when billionaire-owned media outlets aren’t covering for Johnson and his party, they’re busy attacking Corbyn. Fortunately, people are seeing right through the haze and calling out the ridiculous media bias.

A terrible choice? Really?

Ian Dunt presents a pro-Remain podcast and edits politics.co.uk. The latter has links to Yahoo! News and boasts of working “from deep within the corridors of power in Westminster”. And from this bubble, he spewed out the following comment:

 

 

God knows what we did a previous life to deserve a choice between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn, but it must have been fucking terrible.

— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) November 18, 2019

While some people replied by rightly pointing out that Britain (or its government, anyway) has been far from saintly in the past, most highlighted the absurdity of suggesting it was difficult to choose between Johnson and Corbyn:

https://twitter.com/Cheryl_ThePeril/status/1196475407240970240

One person thrashed this idea out in more detail:

https://twitter.com/Ciara87C/status/1196460352529207297?s=20

https://twitter.com/Ciara87C/status/1196461931344863232

Others echoed this sentiment:

Oh do one will you. Millions are impoverished and you equate the two? One helped cause it the other will fix it, not all of us can afford to be so snide!

— Damien Willey 🟢 🔴 (@KernowDamo) November 18, 2019

Corbyn offers the hope of a fair society for all. I am so completely fed up of blue tickers telling me, and millions of others, that my support for a principled man who has spent his whole life working for others is unjustified. He has the policies too. 200+ now #VoteLabour ❌ pic.twitter.com/2ItYItzJpt

— Prof Gayle Letherby (@gletherby) November 18, 2019

The media’s ‘full on’ attacks on Corbyn

An adviser to Johnson recently spoke of “the big newspapers” attacking Labour “full on from the off” in the current election campaign. This has meant boosting anti-Corbyn bigots and warhawks. And the BBC has received particular criticism.

New research from academics at Loughborough University, meanwhile, shows newspapers have been pushing a clear anti-Labour position so far:

Our research shows @UKLabour had a substantial deficit of positive to negative news reports in the first week of #GE2019. Read the full @lboroCRCC report: https://t.co/f4V5b3Pv4o

Image: Overall evaluations in newspapers (weighted by circulation) pic.twitter.com/Ir0ubLVDkJ

— Loughborough University (@lborouniversity) November 15, 2019

This is no surprise, though. Because Corbyn is taking on the ultra-rich to get justice for the general population. And as the Media Reform Coalition’s (MRC) 2019 report highlighted:

just three companies (News UK, Daily Mail Group and Reach) dominate 83% of the national newspaper market (up from 71% in 2015).

Around 80% of online media, meanwhile, sits with “just five companies (News UK, Daily Mail Group, Reach, Guardian and Telegraph)”.

Importantly, the MRC stressed:

Concentrated ownership creates conditions in which wealthy individuals and organisations can amass vast political and economic power and distort the media landscape to suit their interests.

Writer George Monbiot backed this up, insisting:

We give newspapers a free pass by calling them "the tabloid press", as if the problem is the format.
It's not.
The problem is the ownership. We should call them what they are. "The billionaire press".

— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) November 18, 2019

Even right-wing journalist Peter Oborne has had enough of the cosy elitist club of right-wing politicians and the billionaire media. So he’s now contributing to a website detailing “the lies, falsehoods and misrepresentations of Boris Johnson and his government”. And in a revealing Guardian article, he wrote:

I have talked to senior BBC executives, and they tell me they personally think it’s wrong to expose lies told by a British prime minister because it undermines trust in British politics.

Boris Johnson lies shamelessly, continuously, systematically, habitually. Why is he allowed to get away with it? My Op Ed in tomorrow's Guardian:https://t.co/u5lggiWQi7

— Peter Oborne (@OborneTweets) November 18, 2019

Which side are you on?

Around 43% of voters currently view Boris Johnson favourably, while only 24% view Jeremy Corbyn favourably. And many people see the hand of the billionaire media in making people think this way:

Out of interest – what’s the main reason for the anti-Corbyn attitude in the UK? From an outsiders perspective it seems to be a lot of negativity whipped up by your media but not based on anything concrete. Is that wrong..? Genuine Q.

— Shauna B-Money (@ShaunaBMoney) November 18, 2019

God knows what we did in a previous life to deserve political commentators who facilitate far-right power-grabs by implying they are equally as dangerous as a social-democratic people's movement.

— jonny (@jonnypanda) November 18, 2019

One person also shared this poignant image:

Image

Despite the opposition of the billionaire media and its allies, Corbyn’s Labour has over 500,000 members and is offering bold, sensible policies to empower the majority of the population rather than just the ultra-wealthy few. The Conservative Party, meanwhile, has received over £50m from around a third of Britain’s billionaires since 2005; and by 2023/24, it will reportedly have gifted these elites “tax breaks and corporate giveaways” to the tune of about £100bn since 2010. As Corbyn said:

One in three UK billionaires have bankrolled Boris Johnson’s Conservatives.

Tax breaks for the super-rich and big corporations are set to reach almost £100 billion.

This isn't a coincidence.

— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) November 19, 2019

That’s why the ultra-rich are afraid of Corbyn: because he’d change that. And that’s why our billionaire media is working so hard to stop him. But on 12 December, voters have a real chance to shut that dodgy operation down once and for all.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Sophie J. Brown / YouTube – BBC News

Tags: Jeremy Corbyn
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Boris Johnson held a lavish party to sell our NHS, and used taxpayer money to pay for it

Next Post

Voters just gave Jo Swinson some terrible news

Next Post

Voters just gave Jo Swinson some terrible news

Oxford Union president resigns amid row over blind student

Malta arrests businessman ‘over murder of investigative reporter’

Malta arrests businessman ‘over murder of investigative reporter’

Boris Johnson and the 'factcheckuk' Twitter page header

All Tory HQ could rely on during the leaders' debate was Johnson's lies, so it took propaganda to a new level

GP and Boris Johnson

Watch a GP demolish Boris Johnson’s NHS lies in 64 seconds

Please login to join discussion
Israel
Analysis

Israel executes two unarmed Palestinians after they surrendered

by Charlie Jaay
28 November 2025
Palestine Action
Analysis

Disabled arrestee refuses to be silent, saying “freedom is not to be taken from us without a fight”

by Ed Sykes
28 November 2025
Syria
Analysis

Syria: Fragile peace after Bedouin murders ignite sectarian tensions

by Alex/Rose Cocker
28 November 2025
Barghouti
Skwawkbox

Video: Barghouti honoured with new mural after 24 years as Israel’s political prisoner

by Skwawkbox
28 November 2025
palestine action
Analysis

Shocking new report reveals what really drove the government’s crackdown on Palestine Action

by The Canary
28 November 2025
  • Get our Daily News Email

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact ben@thecanary.co

For other enquiries, contact: hello@thecanary.co

Sign up for the Canary's free newsletter and get disruptive journalism in your inbox twice a day. Join us here.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart