More Tory nonsense, this time over period poverty

The Tory’s latest grand pledge about poverty has not washed with many people. Rightly so, as its new measures to tackle period poverty fall way short of the mark. Moreover, it’s really just sticking plasters on broken legs.

Another day, more lip service?

As ITV News reported, next week the Department for Education (DfE) will roll out free sanitary products for schools. The policy’s not new. It was announced by former chancellor Philip Hammond in 2019. But it’s only just got off the ground.

Under the scheme, primary and secondary schools will be able to order sanitary products. The government will fund these. Girls and young women will be able to access these products when they need them.

Children and families minister Michelle Donelan bigged the project up. She told ITV News:

We know that it is not easy for everyone to access period products where and when they need them.

This scheme will deal with those problems so young people can go about their daily lives without getting caught out if they have come on their period unexpectedly, [have] forgotten to bring products with them or if they can’t afford the products they need.

Girls and women not being able to afford sanitary products is a major problem. As the website Global Women Connected noted, in the UK:

“1 in 10 girls aged 14 to 21 can’t afford menstrual products”
“Half of all schoolgirls miss a full day of school because of their period”
“The average UK woman will spend more than £18,000 on periods over her lifetime”

Period Power speaks

Linda Allbutt from campaign group Period Power was less than impressed. She told The Canary:

It’s an opt in service so I feel some schools may miss this. There are certain restrictions on quantities allowed set against the numbers of menstruating girls. We deliver whatever is asked and whenever it’s asked.

We feel that this is only addressing a small number of menstruaters. Many many women are isolated each month as they cannot afford the correct sanitary protection. This is absolutely a result of austerity measures and this still needs addressing. We are campaigning now to get products in all workplace toilets. [We’ve] already had some success. Toilet paper and soap are expected so why not sanitary products?

Twitter does its thing

The Tory policy also left much of Twitter unimpressed. Melanie Harvey noted that period poverty isn’t exclusive to schools:

Free sanitary products for girls in school is welcome but long long overdue. Now make them free for ALL females. Periods aren’t a choice. Tampax aren’t a luxury, they’re a human right. End #periodpoverty

— melanie harvey (@melharvey72) January 18, 2020

One user raised a good point about health conditions and illnesses:

https://twitter.com/SomeRachael/status/1218463335617847296

Some real talk, right here:

https://twitter.com/cinnamxnwitch/status/1218465845271310338

And, in response to some people asserting that period poverty isn’t a ‘thing’, Alex summed it up quite well:

https://twitter.com/PaperFolderMan/status/1218458753042911232

The root of the issue

As Allbutt alluded to, the policy doesn’t really get to the heart of the issue. Because it isn’t addressing why some people are so poor they can’t afford the products in the first place. To do that, the Tories would have to deal with the following:

30% of children living in poverty.
70% of children in poverty in a household where one person works.
8 million people living in working households but in relative poverty.

If men bled…

Tackling the root causes of period poverty is probably too much to ask of the Tories. But never mind. As Matt neatly summed up:

If men bled once a month out of their cocks, #periodpoverty would have been eroded half a century ago. Sanitary products are a basic necessity, that society should provide free for women; period!

— Matt (@MATTxLAW) January 18, 2020