• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, December 6, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Asda is stooping to new lows to try and stop shoplifters – putting us all at risk

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
3 April 2025
in Analysis
Reading Time: 3 mins read
823 8
A A
0
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

In a move that epitomises corporate overreach and a blatant disregard for civil liberties, Asda has initiated a trial of live facial recognition technology in five of its Greater Manchester stores. This intrusive surveillance tactic not only infringes upon customer privacy but also sets a dangerous precedent for the normalisation of Orwellian monitoring in everyday life.

Asda: intruding on all our privacy with its facial recognition

Asda justifies this invasive measure by citing a rise in retail crime, reporting approximately 1,400 assaults on staff in the past year. While the safety of employees is undeniably important, resorting to mass surveillance is a disproportionate and ethically questionable response. Moreover, none of this addresses the root causes of shoplifting: poverty and capitalism.

The approach by Asda punishes the vast majority of innocent shoppers for the actions of a few, treating every customer as a potential criminal under the unproven guise of deterrence.

The implementation of facial recognition technology in public spaces raises profound ethical and legal concerns. The indiscriminate scanning of individuals’ faces without explicit consent is a gross violation of privacy rights.

Moreover, the accuracy of such technology is highly questionable, with numerous studies highlighting significant biases and error rates, particularly affecting minority communities. Misidentifications can lead to unwarranted confrontations, humiliation, and potential legal consequences for innocent individuals.

Blatant civil liberties violations

Asda’s decision to integrate this technology into its existing CCTV network lacks transparency and public consultation.

There is minimal information on how data will be stored, who will have access, and what measures are in place to prevent misuse. This opacity fuels concerns about data security and the potential for function creep, where surveillance tools are repurposed beyond their original intent without public knowledge or consent.

Civil rights organisations and privacy advocates have rightly condemned Asda’s actions. Campaign group Big Brother Watch noted that:

We are being regularly contacted by people who have been wrongly accused of being a shoplifter after facial recognition in a shop has got it wrong. We’ve supported dozens of people already – but this expansion will mean many more people will be impacted.

It is running a campaign to stop Asda from rolling out facial recognition permanently. It wants people to:

1. Copy and paste the text below onto your social media post.

2. Save the image below to include in your post.

3. Post the message.


🚨 Will you STOP spying on customers with live facial recognition cameras @asda?

I will no longer shop at #Asda supermarkets if you continue to use this rights-abusive surveillance tech.

#StopAsdaSpying | @BigBrotherWatch

Big Brother Watch noted the story of:

Sara, a teenager who was falsely flagged by a facial recognition camera in Home Bargains.

She was wrongly called a criminal whilst doing her shopping, searched, forced to leave the store and told she was banned from shops and supermarkets using this technology up and down the country.

The shop admitted they got it wrong – but took no action to stop shoppers being scanned and falsely accused in future. They’re still using the live facial recognition cameras.

Asda facial recognition must not be normalised

The normalisation of facial recognition in retail settings paves the way for a surveillance state where individuals are constantly monitored and analysed. This not only erodes public trust but also chills free expression and movement, as people alter their behavior due to the omnipresence of surveillance.

Asda’s trial of facial recognition technology is a reckless and unjustifiable assault on personal freedoms. The purported benefits do not outweigh the significant risks and ethical dilemmas posed by such invasive surveillance.

It is imperative for consumers to voice their opposition to these measures and for regulatory bodies to scrutinise and restrict the use of facial recognition in public and commercial spaces. Privacy is a fundamental right, not a commodity to be sacrificed at the altar of corporate interests.

Featured image and additional images via Big Brother Watch

Tags: CapitalismDemocracyHuman rightspoverty
Share618Tweet386ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Even Labour members now hate the party – as a new survey proves

Next Post

2025 Travel Trends! Why Edmonton, Canada Made the List and Must-Visit Spots

Next Post
2025 Travel Trends! Why Edmonton, Canada Made the List and Must-Visit Spots

2025 Travel Trends! Why Edmonton, Canada Made the List and Must-Visit Spots

Quakers Youth Demand

Quakers descend on Met Police HQ - after Youth Demand push back against the far right

Willy De Houelle died at Aintree

Willy De Houelle dying at Aintree shows the British Horse Racing Authority is useless

Netanyahu has visited Hungary amid it saying it will withdraw from the ICC

Hungary is STILL obliged to arrest Netanyahu - even if it withdraws from the ICC

The government spent 20% of the foreign aid budget on asylum seeker hotels in 2024

Labour is still spending 20% of the foreign aid budget in the UK - despite all its 'pledges'

Please login to join discussion
Israel
Analysis

Israel executes two unarmed Palestinians after they surrendered

by Charlie Jaay
28 November 2025
Palestine Action
Analysis

Disabled arrestee refuses to be silent, saying “freedom is not to be taken from us without a fight”

by Ed Sykes
28 November 2025
Syria
Analysis

Syria: Fragile peace after Bedouin murders ignite sectarian tensions

by Alex/Rose Cocker
28 November 2025
Barghouti
Skwawkbox

Video: Barghouti honoured with new mural after 24 years as Israel’s political prisoner

by Skwawkbox
28 November 2025
palestine action
Analysis

Shocking new report reveals what really drove the government’s crackdown on Palestine Action

by The Canary
28 November 2025
  • Get our Daily News Email

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact ben@thecanary.co

For other enquiries, contact: hello@thecanary.co

Sign up for the Canary's free newsletter and get disruptive journalism in your inbox twice a day. Join us here.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart